<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wentworth Clinic &#8211; Website Case Study	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 19:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vincent		</title>
		<link>https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-269415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 19:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sonet.digital/?p=3507#comment-269415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-269301&quot;&gt;Phillipo&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi, that was not what I had in mind when I wrote it. To clarify, there is nothing wrong with keeping &#039;www&#039; in the URL. In actual fact, if you have a site that ranks well, then I would suggest keeping the &#039;www&#039;. The reason we dropped the client&#039;s was that it was a complete redesign and partial re-brand of a site that was not optimised and was split into two separate sites. However, if you do drop &#039;www&#039;, then make sure it is canonically redirected to the non-&#039;www&#039; version and vice versa so that users can still reach it without any issue. Thanks for commenting, and I hope that helps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-269301">Phillipo</a>.</p>
<p>Hi, that was not what I had in mind when I wrote it. To clarify, there is nothing wrong with keeping &#8216;www&#8217; in the URL. In actual fact, if you have a site that ranks well, then I would suggest keeping the &#8216;www&#8217;. The reason we dropped the client&#8217;s was that it was a complete redesign and partial re-brand of a site that was not optimised and was split into two separate sites. However, if you do drop &#8216;www&#8217;, then make sure it is canonically redirected to the non-&#8216;www&#8217; version and vice versa so that users can still reach it without any issue. Thanks for commenting, and I hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phillipo		</title>
		<link>https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-269301</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillipo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 13:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sonet.digital/?p=3507#comment-269301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hola Vincent, your post suggests that you should not use WWW on a website or that it is not needed. Can you be clear for this. If this is right then what happens to sites that have WWW and want to redirect to non-wwww. WIll they lose their Google an Bing search results?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola Vincent, your post suggests that you should not use WWW on a website or that it is not needed. Can you be clear for this. If this is right then what happens to sites that have WWW and want to redirect to non-wwww. WIll they lose their Google an Bing search results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vincent		</title>
		<link>https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-263355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2020 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sonet.digital/?p=3507#comment-263355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-263351&quot;&gt;Paul Stapleton&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for stopping by. I’m glad you like the Wentworth Clinic website. Colours are so important to people, when we designed the site we worked in close collaboration with the client and the results of a survey to develop the colour palette. FYI we don’t handle their social media activities. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-263351">Paul Stapleton</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by. I’m glad you like the Wentworth Clinic website. Colours are so important to people, when we designed the site we worked in close collaboration with the client and the results of a survey to develop the colour palette. FYI we don’t handle their social media activities. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul Stapleton		</title>
		<link>https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-263351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Stapleton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 19:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sonet.digital/?p=3507#comment-263351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They don’t do many social media updates which is surprising for this profession. Nice looking site and I agree the colours play a strong role in how people feel. Black is forbidding and should not be seen on medical websites.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don’t do many social media updates which is surprising for this profession. Nice looking site and I agree the colours play a strong role in how people feel. Black is forbidding and should not be seen on medical websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vincent		</title>
		<link>https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sonet.digital/?p=3507#comment-131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-130&quot;&gt;Sammy&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you, Sammy, I hope you find it useful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-130">Sammy</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you, Sammy, I hope you find it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sammy		</title>
		<link>https://sonet.digital/blog/news/wentworth-new-website-release/#comment-130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sammy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sonet.digital/?p=3507#comment-130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Vincent &#038; Deanna, 
wow yes very interesting !
Thank you, 
Sammy xx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Vincent &amp; Deanna,<br />
wow yes very interesting !<br />
Thank you,<br />
Sammy xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
