Hi, that was not what I had in mind when I wrote it. To clarify, there is nothing wrong with keeping ‘www’ in the URL. In actual fact, if you have a site that ranks well, then I would suggest keeping the ‘www’. The reason we dropped the client’s was that it was a complete redesign and partial re-brand of a site that was not optimised and was split into two separate sites. However, if you do drop ‘www’, then make sure it is canonically redirected to the non-‘www’ version and vice versa so that users can still reach it without any issue. Thanks for commenting, and I hope that helps.

Hi Jonathan, I’m inclined to agree with you that GDPR directive still lacks clarity in certain aspects. However, the language is clear; you must inform users of the data you collect on them and provide them the opportunity to accept or decline the collection of data. In respect to company information – as it says in the article, the law specifies that it should be readily available on your website for visitors to access.

Thanks for stopping by. I’m glad you like the Wentworth Clinic website. Colours are so important to people, when we designed the site we worked in close collaboration with the client and the results of a survey to develop the colour palette. FYI we don’t handle their social media activities.

Absolutely agreed. In actual fact we always have our copyright and that of our clients with the date range of website publication to current date. This article has been updated to reflect this.

Hi Shannon, I disagree, a current copyright typically indicates credibility. Having the date range won;’t make it more or less so. Nonetheless, it’s always wise to verify the facts in any news story.